MedTwenty

Editorial Standards

How we decide what to publish

These standards govern both the journalism and the intelligence database. If a fact cannot be verified, it does not publish.

Verification before publication

Every material fact is checked against a named public source or a documented on-the-record account. Nothing publishes on inference. Where a figure is undisclosed, we say undisclosed rather than estimating without labelling it.

Human approval

Extraction and drafting may be assisted by automated tools, but an editor reviews and approves each article and each structured record. The person who approves a fact is accountable for it.

Sources

We prefer primary documents: filings, regulatory decisions, contract notices, company statements. Where sources speak on condition of anonymity, we explain why and what corroboration exists.

Rumour and speculation

Rumoured transactions are labelled as rumoured, with the basis stated. Speculative valuations are not presented as facts, and target names are withheld where publication would be unfair or unverified.

Analysis and opinion

Analysis is labelled and attributed. Forecasts state their method and assumptions. Index values carry published methodology and are editorial indicators, not regulated benchmarks.

Corrections

Errors are corrected promptly and disclosed rather than quietly amended. Corrections note what changed and when. Database revisions are logged the same way.

Independence

Commercial relationships, memberships and sponsorships do not influence coverage. Commercial content, where it exists, is clearly identified and produced separately from the newsroom.

Not advice

Everything published is for information only. Nothing on this site constitutes investment, financial, legal or medical advice.